The rumbling tensions between the US and China have pushed a number of shipping companies to shift operations from Hong Kong and remove vessels from its flag registry, with others reportedly planning to do so imminently.
The move, first reported by Reuters in March 1, comes amid growing concern in the industry that China could militarise its commercial fleet in conflict – with Taiwan, for example – while US sanctions on Chinese vessels are also playing their part.
While moves away from Hong Kong aren’t likely to be wholesale, they indicate a further shift in sentiment to Chinese shipping, and towards Hong Kong in particular – with ramifications for shippers.
Up until recently, Hong Kong’s flag offered a blend of legal transparency, tax benefits, and global financial credibility, though its close political alignment with Beijing has transformed that same flag into a perceived liability – and shipping companies are responding accordingly.
In essence, this is about both cost and risk associated with flag states. For retailers, manufacturers and logistics planners this is a particular concern because a vessel’s flag state impacts everything from insurance premiums to clearance times.
With increased US scrutiny on Beijing and Hong Kong, there is a feeling that cargo booked onto Hong Kong flagged ships could trigger extra compliance checks, or cause hesitancy from ESG-conscious clients who are concerned with transparency.
That particular issue could be exacerbated further by vessels re-flagging to jurisdictions with less stringent reporting standards, making transparency an issue and adding a further layer of complexity to supply chains.
On the flip side, operators moving to new jurisdictions may have to improve standards and/or adjust operations to meet the regulatory standards of the state they transition to. To that end, those operators that move will undoubtedly incur extra costs which could be passed onto shippers – which is something for the latter to keep in mind if they choose to continue use those services.
In a wider context, the shift away from Hong Kong may see long-established shipping routes begin to change, with operators likely to reorient around alternative hubs such as Singapore or Kaohsiung, affecting timing, pricing and port competitiveness. Within that context, shippers will need to monitor and reassess their supply chain strategies and consider alternative routes, ports and logistics partners to ensure continuity of supply.
At a systemic level, the re-flagging and retreat from Hong Kong are contributing to a fragmentation of maritime governance, which is defined by geopolitical signalling – a ship’s flag is no longer a neutral bureaucratic detail. As a result, the industry is becoming even more politicised.
And, as ships move to different jurisdictions, especially those with limited transparency, global regulators lose visibility and we risk the emergence of a soft shadow fleet i.e. not criminal, but opaque and hard to regulate. To that end, there’s a sense that in trying to escape political entanglement the industry could be breaking the cooperative structures it relies on.
Ref:
1. https://www.reuters.com/markets/shipping-firms-pull-back-hong-kong-skirt-us-china-risks-2025-03-06/
Author: Tom Holmes
Source: Ti Insight
Supply chain strategists can use GSCi – Ti’s online data platform – to identify opportunities for growth, support strategic decisions, help them stay abreast of industry trends and development, as well as understand future impacts on the industry.
Visit GSCI subscription to sign up today or contact Michael Clover for a free demonstration: [email protected] | +44 (0) 1666 519907
For your logistics and transportation management needs
Providing high frequency logistics and supply chain data and analysis for all those invested in the industry.